Search for: All records

This study presents a method to generate historical orthomosaics using Structure-from-Motion (SfM ) photogrammetry, historical aerial photographs, and lidar data, and then analyzes the horizontal accuracy and factors that can affect the quality of historical orthoimagery products made with these approaches. Two sets of historical aerial photographs (1934 and 1951) were analyzed, focused on the town of Woodstock in Connecticut, U.S.A. Ground control points (GCPs) for georeferencing were obtained by overlaying multiple data sets, including lidar elevation data and derivative hillshades, and recent orthoimagery. Root-Mean-Square Error values of check points (CPs ) for 1934 and 1951 orthomosaics without extreme outliers are 0.83 m and 1.37 m, respectively. Results indicate that orthomosaics can be used for standard mapping and geographic information systems (GIS ) work according to the ASPRS 1990 accuracy standard. In addition, results emphasize that three main factors can affect the horizontal accuracy of orthomosaics: (1) types of CPs, (2) the number of tied photos, and (3) terrain. 

Advanced deep learning methods combined with regional, open access, airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data have great potential to study the spatial extent of historic land use features preserved under the forest canopy throughout New England, a region in the northeastern United States. Mapping anthropogenic features plays a key role in understanding historic land use dynamics during the 17th to early 20th centuries, however previous studies have primarily used manual or semi-automated digitization methods, which are time consuming for broad-scale mapping. This study applies fully-automated deep convolutional neural networks (i.e., U-Net) with LiDAR derivatives to identify relict charcoal hearths (RCHs), a type of historical land use feature. Results show that slope, hillshade, and Visualization for Archaeological Topography (VAT) rasters work well in six localized test regions (spatial scale: <1.5 km2, best F1 score: 95.5%), but also at broader extents at the town level (spatial scale: 493 km2, best F1 score: 86%). The model performed best in areas with deciduous forest and high slope terrain (e.g., >15 degrees) (F1 score: 86.8%) compared to coniferous forest and low slope terrain (e.g., <15 degrees) (F1 score: 70.1%). Overall, our results contribute to current methodological discussions regarding automated extraction of historical cultural features using deep learning and LiDAR.